|
|
This blog represents my experiences and my opinion only - often at the bedside.
All posts are short enough for easy reading - therefore I couldn't possibly share all there is to share. This blog is snippets in the life of a patient safety advocate.
Now you can purchase my book of my favorite blog posts and great advocacy tips!
www.icorina.com.
Thank you for visiting.
Ilene Corina
|
|
I just watched Arnold Schwarzenegger in the movie Aftermath. The movie is about a man who loses his family
in a terrible accident that killed 271 passengers on two planes. I’m not giving away anything that isn’t in
the trailer. A person is the cause of the accident. A terrible mistake. The devastated father and husband (Schwarzenegger)
seeks an apology and is offered payment instead. At some point he is offered money in exchange
for a lawsuit. The movie is based on his
search for an apology.
Yet, many people say they want to be sure that the incident
will never happen again or, no other family has to suffer as they did. I’m not sure how that will happen when the
family is paid off but of course, the attorneys need to be paid and that’s how
they get paid, out of the settlement.
If you watch Aftermath, and you have experienced the loss
of a family member because of the medical care they received, consider leaving
a message on the similarities if you see it.
And can anyone learn from this comparison?
I just
listened to a news program during which a Black man was interviewed saying that
he is sick of the rioting. He believes
there should be protests but violence is not appropriate. He understood the anger because he too has
been stopped and profiled numerous times by police. He knew he did nothing wrong but still he was
scared of what might happen to him.
The next
segment of the show was about the large numbers of Black and Hispanic people
dying from Covid-19. Most of the news
segments related to the underlying health problems the black community may have
which are worse now with Covid-19.
I remember
hearing months ago, when the pandemic was at its worst, that doctors needed to
make the painful decision: who would get medical care because they could be
saved and who would not receive care because they could not be helped. Now I wonder: could some doctors also be
making that choice because of the same thought process a white police officer might
have when engaging a black man?
Isn’t it possible that our trusted healthcare professionals are also experiencing bias when it comes to seeing a patient who doesn’t look like them or their family?
I don’t know
the answers but I do hope it is a way for us to recognize how we feel when we
see someone who looks different from us, and in any aspect of our daily lives
to recognize that this person is important.
Whether it’s a police officer or a doctor or anyone else who works with
the public or lives in this society, we must recognize there may be underlying
feelings and emotions that need to be examined
That’s all.
I can only share with you my very personal thoughts about Stella Immanuel and the Front Line Doctors. I won’t discuss the content of what they are promoting, but instead, the fact that they have been given a platform to share what they believe. And that they are practicing “medicine” in a community that serves people like anyone reading this now.
If what they say upsets you
than think about this; they may have been promoting their beliefs and medical
services for years to people who are not aware of what is correct or not
correct when it comes to medical care.
For over 20 years I have been saying that when we, members of the public, (whether we work in healthcare or not), become patients, what happens behind the “curtain” of a doctor’s care is private and rarely discussed with others.
Not knowing if a doctor is giving appropriate, helpful information is crucial to continuing patterns of substandard care. In our TakeCHARGE Ambassador training with young people this past week, a girl shared that her doctor was treating her with care that did not improve her condition. When she spoke with others who had this same condition, she became empowered to change doctors. How many people believe they are doomed to a life of pain or a deadly disease because their beloved, trusted doctor doesn’t know what cures are available? In the case of Stella Immanuel, for how long has she been able to make people believe what she has said is true, because they don’t know anything different? After all, she is a doctor and shouldn’t she know best?
The fact is, until we all start talking about patient care and what to expect when we are with our doctors, they are free to spew misinformation or treat our family members inappropriately, incorrectly or even just wrongly. But health care is not like driving a car. We learn to drive with practice and with a test and know when someone is not driving correctly.
We are all taught the rules of the road. When we walk into a doctor’s care we are at the mercy of their advice and treatment.
I started working with young people in 2006 when two sisters called their doctor “creepy” during a patient empowerment presentation. Since then we learned about the Olympic gymnasts and what they suffered at the hands of their doctor. My research has found that the Olympic gymnasts case was not an isolated case.
You may say that this is not possible, but when someone doesn’t know what an exam is supposed to be like, it gives clinicians an opportunity to make up the rules as they go along.
Starting in 2010 I began working with some people from the transgender community and again was able to learn that the details of medical care and experiences were not being shared. When we opened up the conversation, we learned that many exams and plans of care were different. Whether or not there are standards of care the patients do not know what they are.
The Pulse Patient Activationthrough Community Conversations (PACC) was designed for this reason: so people can share what has worked for them. This is not about giving advice, or what may be seen as medical information or a diagnosis. A PACC is designed to discuss what has worked for you or me, or to find out what has worked for others. When participants who realize they are getting inappropriate or unhelpful care, they then become empowered to change clinicians or at least ask for what they want.
I may hear that your medication worked for you when we have the same or a similar diagnosis, and can now go back to my doctor and ask if I should try that medication. Some doctors may be grateful that you brought this information to their attention and for those who are not, it may help to decide if this is a doctor you want to continue to see.
I wonder how Dr. Immanuel would react if her patient did not want to be treated with the medication she was suggesting, that many feel is not appropriate. A doctor not willing to listen or partner is a doctor I am not willing to continue seeing. But if I were to call her “crazy”, wouldn’t I be just as guilty — of diagnosing someone when I do not have a license to do so? If I said that suggesting her way of doing things is “wrong”, am I now giving medical advice, which is not appropriate for me to do?
As a patient’s advocate, part of my role is to support a patient’s decisions and if I can’t support what someone wants to do for their care or treatment, I should not be their advocate.
I’m not suggesting you go to
medical school, but I am suggesting we start discussing our care through PACC’s
so we know what has worked, or not worked for others.